My goal is to get people thinking

  • Wednesday, June 28, 2017 12:05pm
  • Opinion

During my training as the political action person for the Sumner Education Association, we were told teachers make lousy legislators because they try to be “fair.” Being a state legislator is not about fairness to all, the Washington Education Association speaker said. It’s helping your special interest group and putting them above all other groups in the state.

I’ve thought about that statement many times during the 25 years since I first heard it. The WEA adviser I worked with asked if I wanted to join her in working for the WEA. She eventually became a WEA president. I told her no, because I didn’t like the partisanship and the bias of the WEA.

Recently, I have had two readers ask what my position is when I write my column. I don’t seem to take a stand. I usually describe both sides of an issue. If you read the first part of many of my articles you might think I’m a conservative. If you read the last half, you might believe I’m a liberal. To many, this is waffling. To me, it’s who I really am. I strive to live in the tension between the extremes.

Those who write to criticize my column in letters to the editor are usually conservatives who read part of what I say, ignore my “on the other hand” approach and label me a bleeding-heart liberal. I find this very frustrating. I don’t like to be put in a box and then be reduced to one dimension. I really wish readers would consider all of what I say and then think, rather then taking one sentence and going off on a rant they heard from Rush Limbaugh.

I laughed out loud when one letter-to- the-editor writer said my column was like road kill; she didn’t want to look, but she couldn’t help herself.

I appreciate those kinds of comments because humor is a great way to get past emotion to look at issues more objectively. Humor, if used correctly, is a great way to bridge gaps between people with differing views.

I had one liberal reader, a former teaching associate, criticize my perspective when I argued in favor of 72-year-old Richland florist Barronelle Stutzman whose freedom of religion and speech had been attacked over her refusal to arrange flowers for a gay wedding. This reader reacted emotionally to the issue of gay rights without really trying to understand my more nuanced stance, or my questions: “Where’s the harm?” and “Has the First Amendment freedom of religion clause been replaced by ‘equal protection of the laws’ clause found in the 14th Amendment?”

I work to make my columns countercultural – to challenge whatever the prevailing cultural standards are, whether they are liberal or conservative. My goal is to get people to think. Neither liberals nor conservatives have a monopoly on the truth.

Truth is found at all places of the political spectrum, along with a great deal of error.

To give one’s opinion in an editorial is what is expected, especially in this polarized society that we live in today. All sides in a debate have valid points that need to be listened to and considered, whether we agree or not.

The political action speaker I mentioned at the beginning of this column was right, at least for me. I would make a lousy legislator because I believe in fairness — in saying and acting for the common good, not for some narrow special interest group.

I constantly struggle to look at issues realistically and to cut through the emotion they create.

My editorial goals are to expose people to a “third way” of looking at hot button issues that is balanced and rational. It takes training to be able to properly weigh information, separating fact from opinion.

Unless readers are exposed to this alternative view, they may never even realize it exists. I am trying to make what is hidden in plain view visible to all, even if it seems difficult for readers to determine what I personally believe.

More in Opinion

White nationalism comes to Renton

Let’s just get down to brass tacks — Patriot Front is a… Continue reading

Election quirks: Drop boxes, tossed ballots, fickle voters

Before turning the page on the November election, here are a few questions to ponder.

Washington State Capitol Building in Olympia. File photo
Despite ruling on Public Records Act, we need to keep a close eye on Olympia

Washington Supreme Court upholds that state legislators are subject to the Public Records Act.

Republicans chose political power over the Constitution

I’m astounded and appalled that members of both parties in Congress were… Continue reading

The people who use SNAP are already working

SNAP and other welfare benefits help working, low-income families while boosting the economy

From left, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters, D-Calif., House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., announce they are pushing ahead with two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — charging he corrupted the U.S. election process and endangered national security in his dealings with Ukraine, at the Capitol in Washington on Tuesday. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Will we feel different when Trump is impeached? Probably not

As a historic vote looms in the House, attitudes of the public are pretty hardened on this subject.

Guest Opinion: Eyman’s run an election wildcard for 2020

We knew it would happen. It’s a wonder it took this long.… Continue reading

Growing up as a Republican

I grew up in a Republican home. My family valued honesty, dependability,… Continue reading

Discerning fact from opinion

It can be more difficult than people first think, according to the Pew Research Center.

Why we need media literacy classes now, more than ever

Education on how to find authentic, factual information in today’s digital landscape is a must for future generations

Letters to the editor for the week of Nov. 15

Reader’s child enjoys stories about community Dear editor, I just read “It’s… Continue reading

George Will and ‘conservative sensibilities’

The journalist is a Constitutional Originalist, but the framers’ sole focus wasn’t solely freedom.