Is Renton’s policy to preserve trees just for show? | Letter to the editor

In last week’s paper, Phyllis Forister complained about Renton’s lack of protection for the tress on Rainier Avenue. This is not the first time Renton officials have turned the other way when it comes to protecting large trees. All you have to do is take a look at developments on the East Renton Plateau. Renton is heaven for developers.

In last week’s paper, Phyllis Forister complained about Renton’s lack of protection for the tress on Rainier Avenue. This is not the first time Renton officials have turned the other way when it comes to protecting large trees. All you have to do is take a look at developments on the East Renton Plateau. Renton is heaven for developers.

Here is one example.

In early 2007, the plat of Rosemonte received approval from the King County hearing examiner. In September 2007, Renton came up with its “tree preservation” plan. In 2009 Rosemonte developers asked Renton officials to proceed to annex this property. That is 1 1/2 years after the tree policy became effective, but Renton officials didn’t care.

Six weeks ago, clearing started on 17 acres on Nile Avenue. All the trees came down, including two large maple trees. One of the Renton planners acknowledged that Renton officials didn’t say a thing about protecting any of the trees on this property. They told the developer he could take down all the trees and planting small “stick” trees in their place. Renton officials don’t care about saving mature trees.

As Ms. Forister mentioned, the city received a Green City Award not too long ago. Maybe someone needs to tell this group the truth about Renton.    Renton officials should also explain to their residents and people who live in Renton sphere of influence why they have a “tree preservation policy” but they don’t use it. Is it just for show?

Michael and Claudia Donnelly

Renton