On Carlson and toddler diplomacy


June 2, 2008 · Updated 10:22 AM 

  • 0
  • Print Story
  • Letter/Editor

Regarding John Carlson’s commentary of May 21, Renton Reporter. If he reads his own quoted words of our President, George H.W. Bush is defining the mere act of communicating with leaders we don’t like as “appeasement.” He shows this to be poor policy with the example of Kennedy meeting Khrushchev in 1961.

Mr. Carlson will no doubt enjoy reading of the similar disasters resulting from Nixon meeting Mao, Carter meeting Arafat, Eisenhower meeting Khrushchev, Reagan meeting Gorbachev, etc. Oh, wait, never mind.

The result of Mr. Carlson’s proposal would be so-called “toddler diplomacy.” That is to say, “Well then I’m not your friend anymore!” Is the U.S. really going to lose prestige by high-level communication with, say, the junta in Burma? Should we only talk to people with whom we agree? Is chatting the equivalent of giving up Czechoslovakia?

So far, “toddler diplomacy” is a big factor in our President’s abysmal reputation at home and abroad, and a reason so many Americans of every political stripe – and none – look forward to January 20, 2009.

Chris Cornuelle

Fairwood

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

blog comments powered by Disqus