Attitudes change on farming non-native salmon

‘“It’s amazing. In 28 years, I’ve never worked on an issue with as broad public response as getting rid of these pens,” he said.’

  • Tuesday, February 13, 2018 8:00am
  • Opinion

Not long ago, some of the loudest political voices railing against the danger of farming Atlantic salmon in the waters of Puget Sound came from within chambers of county governments.

Back in 2012, leaders of Island, Whatcom, Jefferson, Skagit and San Juan counties — Democrat and Republican — called for a moratorium on such fish farm operations. They also sought authority to include a ban on them in their respective shoreline management plans.

They reached out to executives in state agencies as well as former governor Chris Gregoire and later Gov. Jay Inslee. They lobbied lawmakers and sought backing of tribes in their quest.

“While Washington state missteps with outdated science, local governments desiring to recognize modern science, job, and environmental and public threats, ask that they be permitted to ban these open finfish feedlots before they destroy the native species, their habitats, and the jobs we have worked so diligently to protect,” former Island County Commissioner Angie Homola wrote in a six-page issue paper delivered to Inslee in August 2014.

A ban should be in place “at least until appropriate locations and methods for the safe installation, management, enforcement, and mitigation in the event of disease or pathogen outbreaks, or accidental release has been established,” she wrote.

The effort was futile, recalled Eric Johnson, executive director of the Washington Association of Counties.

“The Department of Ecology refused to acknowledge that counties were correct in their desire to ban Atlantic Salmon Net Pens because they were a necessity to foster water dependent activities, therefore allowed under the Shoreline Management Act,” he wrote in a blog on the group’s website in August.

His post went up after a catastrophic net-pen failure off Cypress Island, allowing the release of up to 260,000 nonnative salmon.

It brought a swift response from state government and caused a sea change in attitude toward such operations.

Inslee issued a moratorium on processing of any new or pending permits. Commissioner of Public Lands Hilary Franz — who arrived a year ago and was not around when counties clamored for action — has terminated the lease of one of eight fish farms run by Cooke Aquaculture. More terminations are likely.

State lawmakers, who rejected a bill in 2013 to empower counties to ban fish farms, are pushing legislation to bar the state from renewing any leases once the current expire. Tribal governments are on board for shuttering operations, too.

On Jan. 30, the state departments of ecology, natural resources, and fish and wildlife released their investigation of the cause of the net-pen failure and it pinned it on Cooke.

In the course of a news conference, Franz didn’t sound like she foresees a long future for the industry in Washington.

“There is a serious question whether it is in the state’s best interest,” she told reporters.

With this rising tide of political opposition threatening to put them out of business as soon as legally possible, executives of Cooke Aquaculture probably should be devising an exit strategy.

They could wage a protracted legal battle to survive — the firm is fighting Franz’s lease termination decision — at a high cost.

Or they could start the conversation with Inslee and the Democrat-controlled Legislature to ensure adequate financial aid and job training for their employees in the future. And Cooke officials could quietly test the waters on the state’s interest in buying out a couple leases to expedite their departure.

Kurt Beardslee, executive director of Wild Fish Conservancy Northwest, has spent many years striving to use science to change state planning policies. He recalled how the requests of counties fell on deaf ears.

It’s been tough building opposition, until last year’s net-pen collapse.

“It’s amazing. In 28 years, I’ve never worked on an issue with as broad public response as getting rid of these pens,” he said.

“I’m glad it’s finally happening,” he said. “The right thing for our Puget Sound and for our salmon and for our children’s future will be to not have these net pens.”

Jerry Cornfield: 360-352-8623; jcornfield@herald net.com. Twitter: @dospueblos.

More in Opinion

2020 Census and the importance of being counted

Census affects everything from government representation to federal funding.

Letters to the editor for the week of July 12

Reader disagrees with The Reporter’s choice to publish Dear editor, I am… Continue reading

Don’t throw in the trowel, some suffering plants can be saved

Marianne Binetti will be speaking at the Auburn’s Farmers Market at noon… Continue reading

Letters to the editor for the week of June 21

Keep it simple! Dear editor, In regards to the 20 mph limit,… Continue reading

Standing up to sexual assault – A letter to our Renton community

Earlier this month, we all learned about a sexual assault that took… Continue reading

Separate the rotten from the ripe

Community pages can do better to spread information, and not libel

Letters to the editor for the week of June 14

Reader responds to other reader about leaded fuel Dear editor, I would… Continue reading

Legislature: History, investigations and new laws

The 2019 session of the Legislature included controversy, compromise, surprise, new law and more.

Get the garden ready for longer, hotter days

The longer days mean plants are having a growth spurt, so be… Continue reading

Readers discuss the real affect of lead and traffic in downtown Renton

Letters to the editor for the week of June 7, 2019

Come on reader, light my fire

Great conversations at coffee event inspire us to do better for readers

Letters to the editor for the week of Friday, May 31

Why isn’t the city asking for federal funding? Dear editor, I read… Continue reading