Double white line rule is confusing

Re: “First HOT commute going good,” Renton Reporter, Wednesday May 7, 2008

Re: “First HOT commute going good,” Renton Reporter, Wednesday May 7, 2008

The Washington Urban Corridor administrator (Craig Stone) proudly toots his own horn to claim the HOT changes as “going good.”

However, the success of the HOT-lane modifications really depends on the viewpoint of the actual users. As I traveled down State Route 167 intending to use the HOV lane, I found that I couldn’t get in the HOV lane after getting on the freeway because of the DOUBLE LINE, then I found I couldn’t get out of the HOV lane when I saw my exit coming up because of the DOUBLE LINE. This obviously compounds the problems for use by carpooling vehicles and results in total confusion and frustration.

It seems that the primary purpose of the HOV lane to encourage car pooling has been sacrificed for the sake of sole-occupant vehicle drivers willing to pay the price and pad the state wallet.

To maintain the primary intended purpose of the HOV lane, all multi-occupant vehicles should be allowed to cross the DOUBLE LINE at any point without a $124 traffic fine. In addition, other vehicles in the regular lanes should yield to multi-occupant vehicles attempting to reach or exit the HOV lane. Why change the long-standing rules for a few deep pocket individuals?

Abiding by the ridiculous DOUBLE LINE rule for carpooling vehicles will be even more difficult during winter months when daylight hours and visibility of exits are reduced.

I sincerely believe the state has truly goofed on the HOV changes and has severely discouraged multi-occupant vehicle driving and use of the HOV lane. Let’s make the changes necessary to restore the primary intended purpose of the HOV lanes and make it convenient for those users willing to carpool.

Carpooling in HOV lanes cuts down on the number of vehicles on the road and preserves our fuel resources, “HOT” use does not! LET’S PUT THE EMPHASIS WHERE IT NEEDS TO BE!

Gerald Wooldridge

Renton

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor for the week of Nov. 15

Reader’s child enjoys stories about community Dear editor, I just read “It’s… Continue reading

Why not change the name to match the location?

To Lakeside Industries, As a longtime resident of Renton, I’m concerned about… Continue reading

Addressing concerns, inaccurate statements

To facilitate fact-based discussion about Lakeside Industries’ application to relocate its Covington… Continue reading

Responsible pet ownership in Renton

In Renton we are blessed with our own Animal Control. Stray pets… Continue reading

Location all wrong for asphalt plant

I am writing to you to express my opposition of the Lakeside… Continue reading

Continued support needed this election for Renton Schools

We would like to extend a heartfelt thank you to every Renton… Continue reading

Invest in our future

I am writing to you to express my support for both the… Continue reading

Vote yes to support Renton schools

Two important school funding measures are on the Feb. 12 ballot. Voter… Continue reading

Help support the district by voting yes

Help us accomplish more with less. In last week’s edition, long-time Renton… Continue reading

Get out the vote for Renton Schools

We just had a very important mid-term election in November, but now… Continue reading

Chamber endorses school district’s ballot measures

The Renton Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors voted unanimously to endorse… Continue reading

I see the positive impact from supporting our schools

I am a passionate supporter of both the Building for Excellence School… Continue reading